Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 4.5V
GLM 4.5V is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3.8 27B offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3.8 27B or GLM 4.5V based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3.8 27B | GLM 4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.60 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.88 | $1.80 |
| Context window | 1M | 66K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 152 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1438 | 1333 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1590 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1269 | 1154 |
FAQ
Is Qwen3.8 27B or GLM 4.5V cheaper?
GLM 4.5V is cheaper on output tokens ($1.80 vs $1.88 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or GLM 4.5V?
Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.