Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3.8 27B offers a larger context window. Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.8 27B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.40 | $1.88 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Parameters | 550B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Jun 2026 | — |
| LiveBench score | 50.7 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 85.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 146 | 152 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1445 | 1438 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1590 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1269 |
FAQ
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.8 27B cheaper?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on output tokens ($1.88 vs $2.40 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.