Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3.8 27B offers a larger context window. Choose Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 or Qwen3.8 27B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Nebius Token Factory | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.80 | $1.88 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1320 | 1438 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 152 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1590 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1269 |
FAQ
Is Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 or Qwen3.8 27B cheaper?
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 is cheaper on output tokens ($1.80 vs $1.88 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.