MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3 Coder Next offers a larger context window. Choose MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 Coder Next based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.12 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 | $0.80 |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Parameters | — | 80B |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| LiveBench score | 65.0 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 146 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1405 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1398 | — |
FAQ
Is MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on output tokens ($0.80 vs $1.20 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.