Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Choose Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 33K |
| Parameters | 109B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 130 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1230 |
FAQ
Is Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on output tokens ($0.30 vs $1.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.