Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Inkling
Inkling is cheaper on output tokens, while Inkling offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Inkling based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Thinking Machines |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.40 | $1.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.20 | $4.05 |
| Context window | 131K | 524K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Mar 2025 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1152 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 88.3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 149 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1415 |
FAQ
Is Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Inkling cheaper?
Inkling is cheaper on output tokens ($4.05 vs $4.20 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Inkling?
Inkling has the larger context window (524K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.