GLiNER2.5-Decide vs Sieve 9B v2
Sieve 9B v2 is more accurate on the Jev Decision Index, Sieve 9B v2 is better calibrated. Choose on whichever of accuracy, calibration and cost matters most for your decisions.
| Spec | GLiNER2.5-Decide | Sieve 9B v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Fastino | Sthānika AI |
| Decision Index score | 10.1 | 47.0 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | 0.088 | 0.073 |
| Median latency (p50) | 23 ms | 51 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | — |
| Parameters | 486M | 10B |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no, Extraction (typed spans) | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Span encoder (GLiNER family) | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is GLiNER2.5-Decide or Sieve 9B v2 more accurate?
Sieve 9B v2 scores higher on the Jev Decision Index (47.0 vs 10.1).
Which is better calibrated, GLiNER2.5-Decide or Sieve 9B v2?
Sieve 9B v2 has the lower expected calibration error (0.073 vs 0.088), so its stated confidence is closer to how often it is right.
Is GLiNER2.5-Decide or Sieve 9B v2 cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.