DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens. Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.19 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.65 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Parameters | — | 400B |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Released | — | Apr 2025 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 89.8 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 156 | 132 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1463 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1618 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1277 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 15.6 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens ($0.60 vs $0.65 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
Both models offer a similar context window.
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.