Gemma 3 27B IT vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemma 3 27B IT is cheaper on output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Choose Gemma 3 27B IT or Llama 4 Scout based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Gemma 3 27B IT | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cortecs | Meta |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.3M |
| Parameters | — | 109B |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Aider Polyglot score | 4.9 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 47.7 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1165 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 130 |
FAQ
Is Gemma 3 27B IT or Llama 4 Scout cheaper?
Gemma 3 27B IT is cheaper on output tokens ($0.30 vs $0.30 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Gemma 3 27B IT or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.