Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) vs Nirnaya 0.4B
Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) and Nirnaya 0.4B have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) | Nirnaya 0.4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baseten | kshitijthakkar |
| Decision Index score | — | 3.5 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.046 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 14 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | Free | — |
| Parameters | — | 390M |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Question types | — | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | — | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | — | — |
FAQ
Is Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) or Nirnaya 0.4B more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) or Nirnaya 0.4B?
No calibration difference between Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) and Nirnaya 0.4B is recorded yet.
Is Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) or Nirnaya 0.4B cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.