Aplomb 1 vs Baseten: Elephant 1 (free)
Aplomb 1 and Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | Aplomb 1 | Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | EmpirioLabs AI | Baseten |
| Decision Index score | 40.8 | — |
| Calibration error (ECE) | 0.075 | — |
| Median latency (p50) | 54 ms | — |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | Free |
| Parameters | 5B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | — |
| Mechanism | Decoder LM with a decision readout | — |
| License | empiriolabs-model-license-1.0 | — |
FAQ
Is Aplomb 1 or Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, Aplomb 1 or Baseten: Elephant 1 (free)?
No calibration difference between Aplomb 1 and Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) is recorded yet.
Is Aplomb 1 or Baseten: Elephant 1 (free) cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.